✅ Correct Answer:
Strategic items
Explanation:Integrative negotiation (also called collaborative, win–win, or principled negotiation) is typically used for
strategic items — those that are high value and high risk within the
Kraljic Matrix.
These items are critical to organisational success and often require long-term, trust-based partnerships with suppliers.
The goal is not just to divide value, but to
create additional value through joint problem solving, innovation, risk sharing, and mutual benefit.
Collaboration and integrative approaches ensure sustainable supply, resilience, and competitive advantage.
❌ Why the other options are wrong:
- Leverage items: Although they are high value, they are low risk, with many alternative suppliers. Negotiations here are typically competitive/distributive (win–lose), aiming for cost savings rather than collaboration.
- Routine items: Low value and low risk, often procured through standardised processes, e-procurement, or catalogues. Negotiation effort is minimal.
- Commodity items: These are usually market-standard, low-differentiation products. They are subject to price competition and tendering, not long-term integrative negotiations.
🧠 Summary:
Integrative negotiation = Strategic itemsCompetitive/distributive negotiation = Leverage itemsTransactional approaches = Routine/Commodity items
- 📖 Source:
- Adapted from CIPS L4M5 Study Guide: Commercial Negotiation (2023 edition), Chapter 1.2.1