L5M7 Paper 1 - Free

L5M7 Paper 1 – Free

Test your knowledge with this practice exam

Questions

Minutes

NOTE: The answers provided haven't been verified by an official CIPS-affiliated entity. Therefore, consider discussing your concerns with the instructor or fellow students in the Peer Review Dashboard for clarification.

Useful Icons
📢 - Report an issue with the question
🔊 - Read the question aloud
🔽 - Collapse the question

Press the START button to begin the practice exam.
"We're rooting for you all the way! All the best. 😃"

Time Remaining 00:00

Question 1 of 25

1 Verdana Consumer Goods has mapped its supply chain from cotton farms in India through spinning mills, fabric manufacturers, garment factories, and distribution centres to its retail stores. Its procurement director observes that multiple raw material suppliers feed into a single finished goods supplier. Which statement most accurately describes the difference between what Verdana is observing and a traditional supply chain?

A supply chain is used in manufacturing, whereas supply networks are exclusive to service industries A supply network is a single linear sequence of suppliers, whereas a supply chain involves multiple parallel flows A supply chain is managed strategically, whereas a supply network focuses only on operational deliveries A supply chain includes only direct suppliers, whereas Verdana is observing a supply network of interconnected relationships across multiple tiers

✅ Correct Answer: A supply chain includes only direct suppliers, whereas Verdana is observing a supply network of interconnected relationships across multiple tiers

📌 Explanation
A supply chain is linear and sequential — a flow from raw material to end customer. A supply network is a web of interconnected supply chains with multiple tiers feeding one or more focal organisations, which is exactly what Verdana is observing.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Option B confuses the strategic role of SCM with the structural distinction between chains and networks. Option C reverses the definitions entirely. Option D is factually incorrect — both structures apply across manufacturing and service sectors.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Supply chains, supply networks and SCM [p.1]

2 Which of the following best describes the primary purpose of Supply Chain Management (SCM)?

To manage financial transactions between buyers and sellers along the supply chain To ensure that all purchases are made from Tier 1 suppliers to reduce complexity To actively coordinate supply chain activities so as to maximise customer value and achieve sustainable competitive advantage To reduce the number of suppliers in order to simplify procurement administration

✅ Correct Answer: To actively coordinate supply chain activities so as to maximise customer value and achieve sustainable competitive advantage

📌 Explanation
SCM is defined as the active management of supply chain activities to maximise customer value and achieve sustainable competitive advantage, encompassing the SCOR processes: Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Supplier reduction (A) may be one tactic but is not the definition of SCM. Restricting purchases to Tier 1 (C) describes a sourcing constraint, not SCM's purpose. Managing financial transactions (D) describes accounts payable functions, not SCM.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Supply Chain Management [p.1]

3 Kalahari Logistics plc manages distribution for a range of consumer goods manufacturers. Its data shows that small weekly demand variations of ±3% at retail level result in order swings of ±25% at the raw materials tier. Which of the following best explains why this amplification occurs?

Retailers are placing fraudulent orders to obtain early delivery of goods Raw material suppliers are deliberately inflating production costs to justify higher prices The SCOR model does not account for multi-tier supply networks and therefore underestimates demand Demand forecast errors, order batching, and price fluctuation incentives cause each upstream tier to over-order relative to actual demand

✅ Correct Answer: Demand forecast errors, order batching, and price fluctuation incentives cause each upstream tier to over-order relative to actual demand

📌 Explanation
The bullwhip effect occurs because each upstream tier buffers its uncertainty by over-ordering, driven by demand forecast errors, order batching, price fluctuations, and rationing/shortage gaming — amplifying variability as it moves upstream.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Option A describes fraud, not a structural supply chain phenomenon. Option C describes a pricing behaviour, not demand amplification. The SCOR model (D) is unrelated to the cause of the bullwhip effect.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Bullwhip Effect [p.8]

4 Verdana Consumer Goods is experiencing significant demand amplification across its supply network. Which TWO of the following actions would most directly mitigate the bullwhip effect? Select TWO.

Introducing collaborative demand forecasting between Verdana and its Tier 1 suppliers Reducing the number of delivery locations to simplify logistics operations Switching all supplier contracts to fixed-price agreements with annual price reviews Increasing safety stock levels at all tiers of the supply network Implementing vendor-managed inventory (VMI) to share real-time demand data with suppliers

✅ Correct Answer: VMI and collaborative demand forecasting

📌 Explanation
VMI and collaborative forecasting both reduce the information asymmetry that causes bullwhip amplification by giving upstream tiers real-time visibility of actual demand, eliminating the need for each tier to buffer uncertainty independently.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Increasing safety stock (A) absorbs the effect but does not address its root cause. Fixed pricing (C) may reduce price-gaming but alone does not resolve demand distortion. Fewer delivery locations (E) is a logistics efficiency measure with no direct impact on demand signal accuracy.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Bullwhip Effect mitigation [p.8]

5 In supply chain terminology, which of the following correctly identifies an 'upstream' activity for Hartfield Energy Co., an energy equipment manufacturer?

Managing after-sales maintenance contracts with end clients Distributing finished energy systems to project sites Invoicing customers for completed installation projects Sourcing specialist steel components from a Tier 2 raw material processor

✅ Correct Answer: Sourcing specialist steel components from a Tier 2 raw material processor

📌 Explanation
Upstream refers to activities and relationships moving towards raw material suppliers — further from the end customer. Sourcing from a Tier 2 processor is upstream of Hartfield's manufacturing operations.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Distribution (A), maintenance contracts (B), and customer invoicing (D) are all downstream or post-sale activities — moving towards, not away from, the end customer.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Upstream vs Downstream [p.5]

6 Which of the following is NOT identified as a cause of the bullwhip effect in supply chains?

Demand forecast errors at each tier of the supply network Order batching, where buyers consolidate orders to reduce transaction costs Rationing and shortage gaming, where buyers over-order anticipating supply shortfalls Centralised procurement structures that consolidate purchasing authority

✅ Correct Answer: Centralised procurement structures that consolidate purchasing authority

📌 Explanation
The recognised causes of the bullwhip effect are: demand forecast errors, order batching, price fluctuations, and rationing/shortage gaming. Centralised procurement structures are not a cause — they may actually help reduce the effect by consolidating demand signals into a single, more accurate picture.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Options A, B, and C are all documented causes of bullwhip demand amplification in multi-tier supply chains.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Bullwhip Effect causes [p.8]

7 The SCOR (Supply Chain Operations Reference) model encompasses five core management processes. Which of the following correctly lists all five?

Identify, Qualify, Contract, Order, Receive Design, Source, Produce, Store, Ship Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return Forecast, Purchase, Manufacture, Warehouse, Distribute

✅ Correct Answer: Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return

📌 Explanation
The SCOR model defines five core processes: Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, and Return — forming the standard framework for supply chain management referenced in CIPS L5M7.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Options B, C, and D each mix operational tasks and procurement stages that are not part of the SCOR framework's defined structure.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — SCM and the SCOR model [p.1]

8 Consider the following statements about supply chains and supply networks: 1. A supply chain is characterised by a linear, sequential flow from raw material to end customer. 2. A supply network involves multiple interconnected tiers of suppliers and more realistically represents modern procurement. 3. Supply Chain Management (SCM) focuses exclusively on physical goods movement rather than information flows. 4. The bullwhip effect is a phenomenon unique to supply networks and does not occur in linear supply chains. Which TWO statements are correct?

1 and 3 only 1 and 2 only 3 and 4 only 2 and 3 only

✅ Correct Answer: 1 and 2 only

📌 Explanation
Statements 1 and 2 are both correct per CIPS L5M7 definitions. Statement 3 is incorrect — SCM explicitly encompasses information flows, financial flows, and coordination, not just physical goods. Statement 4 is incorrect — the bullwhip effect occurs in any multi-tier supply chain, not exclusively in networks.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Any option including Statement 3 or 4 is incorrect, as both contain factual errors about SCM scope and the bullwhip effect's applicability.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 [p.1–8]

9 Verdana Consumer Goods has installed a shared demand visibility portal giving all Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers access to point-of-sale data. After 12 months, order volatility at the raw material tier has dropped from ±28% to ±6%. Its Head of Supply Chain is now evaluating whether to extend portal access to Tier 3 suppliers — raw material extractors in emerging markets with limited IT infrastructure. Which evaluation is most appropriate?

Verdana should transfer full procurement authority to Tier 3 suppliers to eliminate demand distortion at source The benefits of further reducing bullwhip effect at Tier 3 are likely to outweigh integration costs, making extension strategically justified despite implementation challenges Extension should be postponed indefinitely as digital systems are not suitable for emerging markets The bullwhip effect only operates between Tier 1 and Tier 2, so extending the system further would produce no additional benefit

✅ Correct Answer: The benefits of further reducing bullwhip effect at Tier 3 are likely to outweigh integration costs, making extension strategically justified despite implementation challenges

📌 Explanation
The bullwhip effect amplifies across all tiers including Tier 3. The demonstrated 78% volatility reduction at existing tiers provides compelling evidence for extension. Implementation challenges are real but do not outweigh the strategic benefit of supply chain-wide demand transparency.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Option A is overly absolute. Option C is factually incorrect — the bullwhip effect operates across all tiers. Option D confuses demand transparency with procurement authority transfer.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Bullwhip Effect [p.8]

10 A supply chain for Crestfield Retail Group has four tiers. At the retail level, demand varies by ±5%. Historical data shows the bullwhip amplification factor between each consecutive tier is approximately 2×. What is the expected order variability at the Tier 3 (raw material) level?

±40% ±20% ±30% ±10%

✅ Correct Answer: ±40%

📌 Explanation
With a 2× amplification factor at each upstream step: Retail ±5% → Tier 1 ±10% → Tier 2 ±20% → Tier 3 ±40%. This calculation illustrates how small retail fluctuations become large upstream swings — the core mechanism of the bullwhip effect.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
±10% (A) stops at Tier 1. ±20% (B) stops at Tier 2. ±30% (C) does not reflect the correct 2× compounding calculation.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.1 — Bullwhip Effect [p.8]

11 Aquila Aerospace Ltd purchases titanium fasteners from a specialist component supplier. That component supplier, in turn, sources raw titanium from a mining company. In Aquila's supply structure, which tier does the mining company occupy?

Tier 2 Tier 3 The mining company is not part of Aquila's supply chain Tier 1

✅ Correct Answer: Tier 2

📌 Explanation
Tier 1 = direct supplier to the buying organisation (the component supplier). Tier 2 = the supplier's supplier (the mining company). Tier 3 would be the supplier of the mining company's inputs. Understanding extended tiers is essential for risk visibility, ethical compliance, and supply resilience.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Tier 1 (A) is the component supplier with a direct contract to Aquila. Tier 3 (C) would be one step further back still. Dismissing the mining company (D) represents a supply chain risk management failure.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.2 — Supplier tiering [p.15]

12 Hines (1994) identified network sourcing as a hybrid between Japanese and Western sourcing practices. Which of the following is a key feature that distinguishes network sourcing from a purely arms-length Western approach?

Network sourcing maintains supplier associations (kyoryoku kai) to share best practice across Tier 1 suppliers Network sourcing relies on a large number of direct suppliers to maintain market competition Network sourcing uses competitive tendering for every purchase regardless of relationship history Network sourcing avoids long-term commitments to preserve buyer flexibility

✅ Correct Answer: Network sourcing maintains supplier associations (kyoryoku kai) to share best practice across Tier 1 suppliers

📌 Explanation
Supplier associations (kyoryoku kai) — groups where Tier 1 suppliers share best practice facilitated by the buying organisation — are a distinctive Japanese-influenced feature of the Hines network sourcing model, absent from Western arms-length approaches.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Competitive tendering for every purchase (A) and a large number of direct suppliers (D) are features of the Western arms-length approach. Avoiding long-term commitments (C) describes adversarial/transactional behaviour.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.2 — Network Sourcing, Hines (1994) [p.22]

13 IKEA's IWAY (IKEA Way) code of conduct is a component of its supply network management approach. Which of the following best explains its strategic purpose?

To eliminate all Tier 2 and Tier 3 supplier relationships through vertical integration To set price ceilings that Tier 1 suppliers must accept as a condition of contract award To document IKEA's internal HR policies for its own employees across 50+ countries To extend IKEA's ethical and environmental standards beyond Tier 1 to influence Tier 2 supplier behaviour

✅ Correct Answer: To extend IKEA's ethical and environmental standards beyond Tier 1 to influence Tier 2 supplier behaviour

📌 Explanation
IWAY is IKEA's supplier code of conduct applied to Tier 1 suppliers, who are required to extend these standards to their own suppliers (Tier 2) — demonstrating how a focal company uses supply chain influence to manage ethical and environmental performance across multiple tiers.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Option A misrepresents IWAY as a pricing tool. Option C contradicts IKEA's model of ~1,800 direct suppliers. Option D confuses IWAY with IKEA's internal HR documentation.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.2 — IKEA case study [p.28]

14 Which of the following is NOT a feature of the network sourcing model as described by Hines (1994)?

A tiered supply structure with a systems integrator at the top A large number of direct (Tier 1) suppliers to maintain competitive market tension Ongoing cost reduction through kaizen at supplier level Competition between Tier 1 suppliers for each subsystem

✅ Correct Answer: A large number of direct (Tier 1) suppliers to maintain competitive market tension

📌 Explanation
Network sourcing specifically uses a small number of direct (Tier 1) suppliers — one of its defining features that differentiates it from the Western arms-length model. A large Tier 1 base characterises the Western competitive approach, not network sourcing.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
A tiered structure with a systems integrator (A), competition between Tier 1s for subsystems (B), and ongoing kaizen cost reduction (D) are all genuine features of the Hines network sourcing model.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.2 — 10 Features of Network Sourcing [p.22]

15 In Porter's Value Chain (1985), activities are classified as either primary or support. Which TWO of the following are classified as PRIMARY activities? Select TWO.

Human resource management Outbound logistics Technology development Firm infrastructure Service (after-sales)

✅ Correct Answer: Outbound logistics and Service (after-sales)

📌 Explanation
Porter's five primary activities are: inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing & sales, and service. Outbound logistics and service are both primary activities that directly create value in delivering the product to the customer.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Technology development (A), human resource management (C), and firm infrastructure (E) are all support activities — they enable the primary activities rather than directly adding value to the product or service.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.3 — Porter's Value Chain (1985) [p.48]

16 Elmbrook Solutions, a professional services firm, has conducted a value chain analysis and identified that its client reporting process consumes 20% of staff time but is consistently rated as low value by clients. The process is standardised and could be replicated by a specialist third party. Which strategic response is most appropriate?

Retain the reporting process in-house and benchmark it against industry peers before making any changes Outsource the reporting process to a specialist provider, freeing resources to strengthen high-value activities Eliminate all reporting entirely to reduce operational costs and redirect every saved hour to business development Invest heavily in upgrading the reporting process to convert it into a source of competitive advantage

✅ Correct Answer: Outsource the reporting process to a specialist provider, freeing resources to strengthen high-value activities

📌 Explanation
Value Chain Analysis directs organisations to outsource or eliminate low-value activities and concentrate resources on those that create competitive advantage. The process is low-value (client-rated), standardised, and replicable — a strong candidate for outsourcing.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Option A invests resources into an activity generating no competitive advantage. Option C is too extreme — reporting may be contractually required. Option D delays necessary action and adds cost without resolving the root strategic issue.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.3 — VCA for competitive advantage [p.52]

17 NexaBuild Ltd has worked with a specialist structural steel supplier for 14 years. The two organisations share production schedules, have co-developed proprietary joint specifications, and the steel supplier has co-located a technical team at NexaBuild's engineering headquarters. Which position on the supply chain relationship spectrum best describes this relationship?

Strategic alliance — because both parties have invested in joint development and share risk and reward Partnership — because they share information and have long-term contracts Preferred supplier — because NexaBuild has consistently chosen to retain this supplier over time Co-destiny — because their mutual integration and co-location make commercial separation effectively unviable

✅ Correct Answer: Co-destiny — because their mutual integration and co-location make commercial separation effectively unviable

📌 Explanation
Co-destiny is the deepest relationship type — characterised by full integration, shared infrastructure, and co-location where separation would be commercially damaging to both parties. Fourteen years of joint specification development and physical co-location confirm this is beyond strategic alliance.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Strategic alliance (B) involves joint investment but not typically co-located infrastructure of this depth. Partnership (A) and preferred supplier (D) are less advanced relationship types that do not reflect the degree of integration described.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.4 — Relationship Spectrum [p.62]

18 Which of the following best characterises an adversarial supply chain relationship?

A price-focused, power-based relationship where the buyer uses leverage to extract maximum concessions from suppliers A relationship where both parties share goals but have not yet formalised joint investment structures A situation where a buyer maintains an approved list of suppliers and selects from them on merit Short-term, contract-based exchanges with no expectation of loyalty but without active hostility

✅ Correct Answer: A price-focused, power-based relationship where the buyer uses leverage to extract maximum concessions from suppliers

📌 Explanation
An adversarial relationship is characterised by price focus, power imbalance, and combative negotiation tactics — the buyer uses leverage to extract maximum value at the supplier's expense.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Option A describes a transactional (arm's-length) relationship — present but not actively hostile. Option C describes a developing partnership. Option D describes a preferred supplier arrangement based on merit rather than power dynamics.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.4 — Relationship Spectrum [p.62]

19 In the 6-stage sourcing process described in CIPS L5M7, which stage immediately follows 'market analysis and supplier identification'?

Negotiation and contracting Issue of ITT/RFQ/RFP and evaluation Relationship management and performance review Supplier appraisal and pre-qualification

✅ Correct Answer: Supplier appraisal and pre-qualification

📌 Explanation
The correct sequence is: (1) Identify need/specification → (2) Market analysis and supplier identification → (3) Supplier appraisal and pre-qualification → (4) ITT/RFQ/RFP and evaluation → (5) Negotiation and contracting → (6) Relationship management and performance review.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
The ITT (D) is Stage 4, negotiation (A) is Stage 5, and relationship management (B) is Stage 6 — all come later in the process.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.4 — Sourcing Process 6 Stages [p.65]

20 Verdanix Enterprises is reviewing how its supply chain creates competitive advantage. Its analysis reveals that suppliers consistently deliver components three weeks ahead of the industry average lead time, and that two Tier 1 suppliers have contributed six patented innovations in the past 18 months. Which TWO of the five competitive dimensions are most clearly evidenced? Select TWO.

Time Innovation Cost Risk Quality

✅ Correct Answer: Time and Innovation

📌 Explanation
The five competitive dimensions through which supply chains add value are: quality, cost, time, innovation, and risk. Delivering three weeks ahead of the industry average directly evidences the Time dimension. Six supplier-contributed patents in 18 months directly evidences the Innovation dimension.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Quality (A) relates to conformance and reliability — not evidenced here. Cost (B) relates to total cost reduction — not referenced. Risk (E) relates to supply continuity assurance — not the focus of these findings.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 1.3 — Five Competitive Dimensions [p.37]

21 Which of the following individuals is most closely associated with the development of Total Quality Management, specifically through the concept of 'zero defects'?

Hines Hammer and Champy Womack and Jones Philip Crosby

✅ Correct Answer: Philip Crosby

📌 Explanation
Philip Crosby is the key theorist associated with the 'zero defects' concept within TQM. Other key TQM contributors include Deming (statistical methods, PDCA), Juran (cost of quality, Pareto), Ishikawa (fishbone diagrams), and Feigenbaum (total quality control).

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Hammer and Champy (A) developed BPR. Womack and Jones (B) developed Lean Thinking (1996). Hines (C) identified network sourcing (1994).

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 2.1 — TQM origins [p.111]

22 Which of the following is NOT a core objective of Total Quality Management (TQM)?

Achieving zero defects through prevention rather than inspection Focusing on both internal and external customer satisfaction Outsourcing quality control activities to specialist third-party auditors Empowering all employees to contribute to quality improvement

✅ Correct Answer: Outsourcing quality control activities to specialist third-party auditors

📌 Explanation
TQM holds that quality is everyone's responsibility within the organisation — it cannot be delegated or outsourced. 'Design quality in, not inspect it out' is a fundamental TQM principle.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Zero defects through prevention (A), employee empowerment (B), and customer focus including internal customers (D) are all genuine TQM objectives defined in CIPS L5M7.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 2.1 — TQM core objectives [p.113]

23 Aquila Aerospace Ltd uses Statistical Process Control (SPC) charts to monitor its component manufacturing processes. The system flags an alert when a measurement falls outside the Upper or Lower Control Limits. What type of variation does this alert signal?

Sampling error — indicating the data collection method is flawed Process drift — indicating the process mean is shifting gradually over time Special cause variation — an abnormal event indicating an assignable cause requiring investigation Common cause variation — normal, expected variation inherent in any stable process

✅ Correct Answer: Special cause variation — an abnormal event indicating an assignable cause requiring investigation

📌 Explanation
SPC distinguishes two types of variation: common cause (random, within control limits — stable process) and special cause (assignable, outside limits — requires investigation). A point outside the UCL or LCL signals special cause variation.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Common cause variation (A) stays within the control limits. Process drift (C) is a pattern trend. Sampling error (D) is a data quality issue unrelated to what SPC control limits detect.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 2.1 — Statistical Process Control [p.125]

24 Hartfield Energy Co. has 500 active suppliers. Its analysis shows that 100 of these suppliers (20%) account for 78% of its total procurement spend. Which analytical tool does this finding directly reflect, and what is the recommended procurement response?

The SCOR model — Hartfield should redesign its supply chain operations reference processes The Pareto/ABC principle — Hartfield should prioritise Category A (high-spend) suppliers for active management while simplifying or automating lower-spend relationships The bullwhip effect — Hartfield should share demand data with its top 100 suppliers to reduce amplification The relationship spectrum — Hartfield should move all 100 high-spend suppliers to co-destiny relationships

✅ Correct Answer: The Pareto/ABC principle — prioritise Category A for active management while simplifying lower-spend relationships

📌 Explanation
The Pareto (80:20) principle in procurement shows that a minority of suppliers drive the majority of spend. This 20%/78% distribution is a classic Pareto outcome. ABC classification follows: Category A (high spend) = active management; Category C (low spend) = automate or simplify.

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
The SCOR model (A) addresses process structure. The bullwhip effect (C) addresses demand distortion. Co-destiny for 100 suppliers (D) would be operationally unmanageable.

📖 Source: CIPS L5M7 AC 2.1 — Pareto/ABC Analysis [p.130]

25 In the Cost of Quality (CoQ) framework, costs are categorised into four types. Which TWO of the following are classified as FAILURE costs? Select TWO.

Calibration and maintenance of quality monitoring equipment Scrap and rework costs within the manufacturing process Investment in supplier quality training programmes Inspection and testing of incoming materials from suppliers Product recalls and warranty claims from end customers

✅ Correct Answer: Product recalls/warranty claims and Scrap/rework costs

📌 Explanation
The CoQ framework has four categories: Prevention (training, design for quality), Appraisal (inspection, testing, calibration), Internal failure (scrap, rework — before the customer), and External failure (recalls, warranty claims — after the customer).

❌ Why the other options are wrong:
Supplier training (A) is a prevention cost. Incoming materials inspection (C) and equipment calibration (E) are appraisal costs. All prevent or detect quality failures rather than resulting from them.

L5M7 Paper 1 – Free

🚩 Report Question Issue

Login Required

Leave a Reply Cancel reply